Why a webcam is better than a DSLR for planet photography
Moderator: Stany Buyle
- Stany Buyle
- moderator
- Posts: 2895
- Joined: Sun 30 Nov 2008 15:05
- Active Member?: Yes
- Post pictures?: Yes
- Contact:
Why a webcam is better than a DSLR for planet photography
After communication with Dodi on this subject I learned that a webcam is much better than a high quality DSLR for planet photography. Why?
kindest regards,
Stany
I like better one good shot in a day than 10 bad ones in a second...
http://www.fotografie.cafe
Stany
I like better one good shot in a day than 10 bad ones in a second...
http://www.fotografie.cafe
-
- AFFILIATED MEMBER
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Fri 18 Dec 2009 23:27
Re: Why a webcam is better than a DSLR for planet photograph
Found this on Dpreview in relation to your question:
dasams wrote:
dasams wrote:
Planets are so small that a full frame sensor is wasting virtually all of the photosites. A webcam, on the other hand, has a small sensor with tiny photosites but is large enough to capture the target. For regular photography, this sucks because of the noise, especially for low light shots. But when you stack a lot of shots, the noise is vastly reduced. Advantage small, cheapo sensor
On the other hand, if you shoot deep space objects (DSO) which are much larger than planets, the D800E is quite nice. dave